A Bible class recently Does Ezra Deserve Critique?

A Bible class recently Does Ezra Deserve Critique?

A Bible class recently had been involved in a conversation Ezra’s that is regarding command the guys of Israel, within the post-Captivity period, store their international spouses (Ezra 10). The writing checks out:

“And the priest endured up, and stated unto them, ‘You have actually trespassed, and have now married foreign females, to improve the shame of Israel. Now therefore make confession unto Jehovah, the Jesus of one’s dads, and do his pleasure; and split up yourselves from the individuals of this land, and through the foreign women’” (vv. 10-11).

The instructor, that is a professor in a Christian college, argued that Ezra’s demand (v. 11) had been given on his or her own effort. He further contended that this guy of Jesus created a challenge much more serious than exactly exactly just what existed currently, into immoral lifestyles because it placed these women in positions of hardship, forcing them.

He additionally cited Malachi 2:16 where Jesus stated he “hated” divorce. Supposedly, this nullified Ezra’s rash action. Ended up being the gentleman correct inside the analysis? Consider the after facets.

Ezra’s Character

The teacher is very mistaken in the view with this situation, in which he is presumptuous inside the attitude toward certainly one of God’s servants that are magnificent.

The inspired narrative says regarding this priest/scribe that is remarkable. “For Ezra had set his heart to get what the law states of Jehovah, also to get it done, and also to show ukrainian bride in Israel statutes and ordinances” (7:10). Missing any information that is explicit this document that casts a shadow upon Ezra, there isn’t any reason in making the fee described above.

The Mosaic Prohibition

As Israel ready to enter Canaan, the individuals had been strictly forbidden to become listed on in wedding using the pagans in “the land” (Deuteronomy 7:1ff). The prohibition that is explicit this: they certainly were in order to make no covenants because of the heathen, nor demonstrate to them mercy. These tribes “in the land” had been a wicked, idolatrous individuals, whoever “cup of iniquity” had been overflowing (Genesis 15:16). And thus Moses declared:

“Neither shall you will be making marriages you shall not take for your son” (Deuteronomy 7:3) with them; your daughter shall not be given unto the foreigner’s son, and his daughter.

The prophet proceeded to explain that such unions would corrupt the Israelites (cf. 1 Kings 11:3-4). Jehovah ended up being wanting to protect their individuals from their particular weaknesses in view of the role that is sacred in the way in which when it comes to coming Messiah.

The Historic Situation

Whenever Hebrews had been released from Babylonian captivity, they arrived home with their land that is native in waves — beneath the leadership of Zerubbabel, then Ezra, and lastly Nehemiah.

Whenever Ezra arrived, he found that some (some more than 100 guys, out of about 29,000) had hitched foreign ladies “of the folks for the land” (Ezra 10:2). It was a violation that is direct of’ injunction.

Ergo, the leader that is great perhaps perhaps maybe not functioning on their own; he previously behind him the force of legislation (cf. Ezra 10:2-3). This course of action ended up being a“surgery that is necessary for the welfare associated with the country most importantly. In certain cases you will find heart-breaking temporal effects connected with wrongdoing, to say absolutely absolutely nothing of this prospective eternal penalty.

Judah’s reaction

Could it be maybe perhaps not significant that the individuals by themselves, once they heard the decree, failed to rise against Ezra, charging you him by having a presumptive, autocratic disposition (as alleged by their “professor” critic)? Instead, they humbly stated: “we have actually greatly transgressed in this matter” (cf. 10:2,13), and “so must we do” (vv. 3,12).

Malachi’s Statement

If the prophet Malachi represented the father as hating “divorce” (2:16), he had been showing the ideal that is divine set forth into the wedding covenant initiated in Eden. That this would not prohibit all divorce proceedings is fairly obvious through the proven fact that breakup ended up being authorized underneath the legislation (Deuteronomy 24:1).


Whenever one violates the legislation of God by getting into a relationship that will never be maintained, repentance needs that the union be severed. To recommend otherwise reveals this one will not realize the character of repentance (cf. Mark 4:18; Matthew 12:41; Jonah 3:10).

A Concluding Note

In conclusion, one must add that this example had been unique to ancient Israel, and doesn’t have bearing on Christian/non-Christian marriages today (see 1 Corinthians 7:13-14; 1 Peter 3:1-2). Yet see: “Should a Christian Marry away from Faith?” elsewhere on our internet site.