In Alaska, Hawaii, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon, civil marriage for same-gender partners is forbidden because of their state constitutions

In Alaska, Hawaii, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon, civil marriage for same-gender partners is forbidden because of their state constitutions

Constitutional amendments banning same-gender civil wedding, civil unions, and domestic partnerships and associated advantages have already been used in Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah. A few of these constitutional amendments also ban civil unions and domestic partnerships and associated benefits for opposite-gender couples. a judge that is federal down Nebraska’s amendment in 2005.

States continue steadily to give consideration to constitutional amendments to prohibit same-gender civil wedding and other appropriate types of relationship recognition.

Amendments to ban same-gender marriage that is civil Alabama, sc, Southern Dakota, and Tennessee await consideration by the voters of the states throughout the 2006 elections.

During the early 2006, the Virginia legislature authorized a measure to amend hawaii’s 230-year-old bill of legal rights to prohibit same-gender civil wedding, therefore ensuring its place in the November 2006 ballot. Amendment bills await second votes by lawmakers in Washington in 2006 and Indiana in 2007.

In March 2006, the latest Hampshire home of Representatives voted 201 to 125 to beat a proposition to amend their state’s bill of liberties by having a constitutional ban on same-gender civil wedding.

Efforts are underway in Arizona, Ca, and Florida to include amendments banning same-gender civil wedding to their particular ballots.

Appropriate challenges, interpretation questions, and scope of applicability of this amendments signal an evergrowing trend in the public-policy arena. Continue reading